26 October 2011

Food Bloggers as Marketing Puppets | Part 2. Marketing Tricks and Psychology

Photo by Sean Bonner

“Your vision will become clear only when you look into your heart.
Who looks outside, dreams. Who looks inside, awakens.”
Carl Gustav Jung
Swiss psychiatrist, Psychologist and Founder of the Analytic Psychology, 1875-1961

Hook, line and sinker

In Australia if the traditional Food Media want to incite an online riot of opinion, they merely need to criticise Food Bloggers. It’s a story guaranteed to hit a raw nerve that is common to all bloggers: the validation of their medium. The provocation will result in debate and a frenzy of hits and backlinks to the article from bloggers, tweeters and readers who subsequently comment across many social media platforms.
But what many amateurs in the online space do not realise, is that they have deliberately been tricked into rage. The whole exercise may have been calculated to create a spike in online newspaper readership figures, to lift the number of page-views, organically boost the paper’s SEO and online influence figures. So the respondents involved will have played right into the hands of the newspapers for marketing purposes.
By publicising the story and spreading the word in social media, the bloggers and tweeters have unconsciously created sufficient free PR to yield above average traffic to the newspaper. The resulting online figures now look great to advertisers contemplating whether to pay for ad space in their publication, iPhone app or online edition.
Some might consider this calculated emotional abuse. For the paper it’s an easy win, requiring no financial investment, and with their readership looking reinvigorated, they can potentially rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars from brand media buyers. Thanks to bloggers, the sales and marketing team will likely have hit their projected targets.
These stories are known as link bait. It’s a controversial marketing ploy and is not the only time that Aussie food bloggers fall for commercial tricks.
This works through psychological manipulation. The technique in this case is known as ‘shaming’ and ‘vilifying’. Think of it as the overbearing parent who tells their children that their grades aren’t good enough. It’s bound to get a reaction from most on the receiving end of the criticism. And yet the same result can come slyly packaged as flattery, for the same purposes.

Modern Marketing Ninjas 

As long time readers of this blog will know I have spent a quarter century in the business of advertising and marketing. My profession has been to make all manner of things desirable to the general public via a mixture of manipulative psychology, beautiful imagery and by generating hype. My technique uses a combination of strategy based on psychographic manipulation and lateral thinking combined with creative input. 

Today anyone marketing a product, service, venue etc, faces tough times. The general public are now more sceptical of marketing imagery on TV and in print than they ever have been. They can filter their entertainment to avoid most advertising that they find intrusive or annoying. Some products have even been banned from traditional advertising media. So with marketers facing increasing sales targets from their employers, the search has been on to find a way to advertise surreptitiously. 

And what exactly is this hidden advertising or guerrilla marketing? The most common ninja deployed is product placement. Take Australian Masterchef for example. The products you see being used have been provided by the brand advertiser in exchange for six figure sums to the TV production company. 

This may be reinforced by advertising around the show, costing millions, paid to the TV network - whether aired on TV or their magazine’s ads or even on the Masterchef website and recipe fact sheets. The aim is that the general public will subconsciously identify branded products as being desirable or necessary next time they stock their pantry. The wealthiest brands also use product placement in Hollywood movies and popular drama or comedy TV series, reaching significantly larger audiences.

But shows like Masterchef are not on TV all year, so food brands in particular - and especially those with smaller budgets - are forced to be more creative in finding their target market. 

The trending buzzword for advertisers is ‘Word of Mouth Marketing’. The power of recommendation by a friend or trusted source is now recognised as the ultimate way to convey a marketing message that will generate sales.

Magazine or newspaper Advertorials are a word of mouth option. It looks to all intents like a magazine story, it has been composed by a journalist and the staff photographer, but it’s actually a sponsored piece, a revenue stream for publications. It costs the advertiser in design, photography and media placement fees.

Advertorials are designed to trick you into thinking the ‘discerning Magazine Editor’ prefers that product/brand. Advertorials state ‘advertising feature’ or ‘promotion’ at the top of the page revealing its true nature. But even this is wearing thin with the public. So where else can advertisers create hidden influence?

There is a marketing term, “Hitting all the consumer touch points” and that now also includes product placement and advertorials or infomercials on blogs. So bloggers who have appeared in mainstream media stories, who have released details of high page view numbers, or high Twitter follower counts and a track record of influence, are the new target for marketing. 

They are known generically as ‘online influencers’ and are now subject to heavy lobbying by PR companies and advertising agencies. Many of us in food blogging know it as the dreaded PR spam in marketing circles it is known as Blogger Outreach Programs and Blogger Bribes.

The attraction lies in the notion that an advertiser can covertly target the exact demographic required through a food blog. Just as they can in the food press, but with possibly an even narrower skew – such as Baker blogs having a high readership of those who also love to bake, or venue review blogs that back-link to Urbanspoon and attract people who regularly go to restaurants. Plus bloggers are more adept at using multiple social platforms including Twitter, Digg, Stumbleupon and Facebook in their broadcast mix than traditional food media, which equates to even more publicity hitting the target.

Your new BFF 

So, in Advertising strategy, bloggers are now seen as cheap and easy puppets for marketing messages as compared to traditional forms of advertising. By example, many food bloggers have already shown a predilection for going to events and receiving freebies in exchange for a blog post on their attendance or promotional item, so why not cosy up to them? Brands now aim to be your BFF.

 After all, most who write blog review posts, will happily spend their own money trying venues and unsuspectingly giving free PR to the venue, so in advertising terms, why not extend that to products, loyalty clubs and services too? The potential is there for a brand’s new online ‘friends’ to generate free blog advertorials and extended social media broadcast too.

For brands, blogger outreach is significantly cheaper than paying publications for the same. Plus the blogger does all the design work, copywriting and photography for free - services that cost tens of thousands of dollars to commission professionally. Giving away samples, organising an event or junket to bloggers can be much cheaper by comparison.

It’s also a way for PR agencies and Blog Harvesters such as Nuffnang, Technorati and Foodbuzz to farm bloggers in order to make money on the back of this free resource. Typically it works by charging brands for harvested email databases or for permissions received from the bloggers. Some harvesters will potentially pay bloggers a small fee lower than market value for commercial digital insertions in return. 

Others companies to farm bloggers are market research companies and new hybrid harvesters who charge bloggers to be part of a directory that will build page rank and SEO plus marry your blog with advertisers and PR agencies.

Trust issues 

It is a given that journalists’ salaries are derived from publications’ advertising revenue, and hence edited opinions can be biased. So blog readers typically cite their interest is due to content being unrestrained by editors, advertisers or a commercial publication’s particular values or politics. Marketers are aware that many of the public have eschewed papers and magazine for blogs, in search of the truth. 

So blogs appear to have integrity. It is generally supposed by the public that they are not affected the way that news has been tainted. They represent Jo Average’s opinion. So when a blog broadcasts about brands, the reader assumes it is a personal and unbiased opinion and recommendation that has not been initiated by an advertiser or fuelled by supplied content. 

But this is increasingly not true. A blog post can be a ‘Stealth Marketing’ brand ninja, especially where many amateur food bloggers have not publicly declared their shift to becoming professional salesmen, or pro-bloggers in exchange for gifts or money.

This is compounded by the fact that bloggers seem to be unaware of the ACCC Advertising and Selling standards stating advertisers should “ensure that consumers are aware of the fact that a commercial message is being presented”. 

Bloggers are required to clearly mark that the post is a sponsored piece, as per an advertorial or infomercial is transparent about its bias. It’s possible that many PR agencies and marketers seem not to know this either or perhaps are happy to parlay the deception and puffery?

Since some food blogs have already fallen under the spell of the PR machine, the term Flogger-Blogger has emerged. By this I mean when a blog that feels to all intents as though most posts are actually subliminal ads, designed to have your friends share the good word and generate publicity for a brand by spreading the post across the internet, conversations and by email. Ultimately this is the goal of marketing through amateur bloggers.

The Seduction of Eve 
I think that most Australian food bloggers have innocently entered the media as a place to air their thoughts, but appear vulnerable to the potential traps of that space. The traps I refer to are those of potential loss of integrity and falling victim to commercial manipulation. And I sense that some Food Bloggers are falling victim to Fox and Crow syndrome.
So what are the tricks to look out for? Behind most modern marketing tricks is psychology - the study of human behaviour - and how to take advantage of these insights to assist selling things. 

"According to George K. Simonsuccessful psychological manipulation primarily involves concealing aggressive intentions and behaviours. Also, knowing the psychological vulnerabilities of the victim to determine what tactics are likely to be the most effective."
The most fundamental aspect that is taken advantage of by marketing and advertising is the human desire to feel good. It is thought that we tend to see our life as judged against other people and that our happiness is relative to this.
We compare our lot against others. Richer people do get happier when they compare themselves against poorer people, but poorer people are less happy if they compare up. That is why Marketers target our self esteem when aiming to seduce us for their purposes
Nathaniel Branden in 1969 defined self-esteem as "...the experience of being competent to cope with the basic challenges of life and being worthy of happiness". According to Branden, self-esteem is the sum of self-confidence (a feeling of personal capacity) and self-respect (a feeling of personal worth).
He also claimed that any positive stimulus or incentive will make a person feel comfortable, or, at most, better with respect to themselves for just some time.
So when a PR company, brand or Marketer approaches a blogger to promote their cause, they will – like Eve’s serpent – cajole and flatter us, tell us that we are deserving of special treatment and offer a sense of personal exclusivity that will make us feel a step ahead of others. They will talk it up with honeyed terms such as “You have been especially chosen to become a Brand Ambassador” or appeal to your desire to have something you can’t afford.
Society has been warned against this behaviour for all of time. Religion and the arts play it out as an enduring theme, cautioning against allowing our shallow desires to trip us up. Yet it proves constantly irresistible to this day, the tactic of ‘positive reinforcement’ is one of the most powerful to encourage Bloggers to generate income for others with no significant remuneration in return for their services.

A mere pat on the head
I like to think of the next trick as summed up by the adage ‘Beware Greeks bearing gifts’ the ‘Trojan Horse’ analogy. While we may warn children not to go with strangers offering gifts, bloggers seemingly also neglect to take that advice. Instead, they are fooled into dropping their guard.
A blogger’s vulnerability in this case is typically coined in psychology as using ‘reciprocity’. The trick is, when given something for free we feel obliged to return the favour. So in our circles when offered a free meal, product, event, book etc, we feel indebted to write a blog post about that gift, often without criticism or significant insight.
Like a dutiful child, we write a public thank you note on social media platforms, which form free publicity for the marketer, brand, service or venue. We take photos, design and cultivate a post – often giving away our intellectual property rights in the bargain – and with theoretically even better results for the brand than ads, because blogs communicate to exactly the right consumers for the promotion.
So the marketing goal is achieved. For virtually a fraction of the cost spent on advertising or loyalty marketing, the blogger has obligingly become a puppet, as a brand salesperson.
In return, the blogger likely receives a regular deluge of press releases with the expectation of future publication each time, with little or no further reward or remuneration for giving away many thousands of dollars of free PR.  In the psychology of persuasion this is known as ‘consistency’.  People want to be consistent with previous actions. If they said yes to something in the past, they’re more likely to say yes in the future.
Meanwhile the PR agency that approached the blogger in the first instance will be receiving a monthly retainer for their services and possibly project fees – but who really is doing all the work here? Who has generated the sales? Who deserves to be paid?  It is the Blogger.
In some other blogging circles – particularly pro-blogging and the influential fashion, beauty and parenting blog communities – this has begun to change, with some bloggers receiving fees directly for their publicity.

Sex and greed, and power
The adage ‘Sex Sells’ referring to scantily clad women in advertising is an old cliché. But sexy is not always so literal. The psychological equation for using sexy persuasion on a blogger for the purposes of converting them to brand salesmen is greed + power. The tactic used appeals to their materialistic impulses, to narcissism and to jealousy.
The technical psych theory is sexual attraction arises when the person is stimulated through the vanity mode of narcissism. It engenders admiration for compatible personality characteristics. Excitement arises when the person is stimulated through the self-pity mode of jealousy, engendering physical intimacy and passion, which theoretically will result in eager and enthusiastic broadcast.

Relative to bloggers, for the social type person, power is channelled through jealousy. For example subconsciously: “This blogger junket will make me feel good and my friends, colleagues etc, envious – they’ll likely find me even more fascinating”, hence the blogger may unconsciously feel sexier for there is social approval and admiration from others.

For the self focused person, power is channelled through narcissism, eg. “They’ve spotted how good I am, so they’ve given me a ‘money can’t buy’ experience, I’m getting something huge for nothing”. The subconscious perception of social reinforcement makes the blogger feel powerful and that in itself is sexy to many.

The overall picture is most people, unless aware of the tactics, can be manipulated. In Blogger Outreach programs the brand they will promote is getting the blogger’s services and time for a fraction of the usual marketing budget, by making the blogger feel a bit sexier, giving them a sense of power and all by appealing to their vanity in order to make them brag. In return the blogger gets a temporary hedonistic head rush and feels an obligation to the brand when they come down off the back of their experience.

The Spin Cycle

So how do else do marketers appeal to a blogger’s deep human impulses for commercial manipulation? They use ‘Spin’.

Spin is “Making a silk purse from a sow’s ear” or “Spinning gold from straw”. It is a form of deception to make something more enticing than it may appear in the cold light of day. It takes the consumer’s aspirations and projects them on a product, venue or person.

Often putting spin on an item avoids facts and focuses on implied benefits. And when applied to politics, is termed propaganda. Using psychology to understand what pulls at the heart strings of the target market, an advertiser will know exactly how to project something to make it seem enticing and highly desirable to consumers.

Spin Doctors are primarily the creators of consumer zeitgeist, ‘future cool’, Cool Hunters and the initiators of global trends. They read public sentiment, understanding how economic movements affect public values and shape cultures. Now when something is suddenly ‘hot’ often it is because key community influencers, like bloggers, were persuaded by the hype, publicity and promotion generated by Spin.

As an example, consider the current Australian fascination for macarons. It started buzzing amongst sweet and bakery enthusiasts and was identified by Spin Doctors as a possible emerging trend within the culinary fashion for small indulgences, such as dim sum, mezze and tapas.

From here it began reaching into online food communities – sometimes via astroturfing, sock puppetry and link baiting.

Advertisers and journalists now typically eavesdrop on social media platforms, so once they picked up on the emerging vogue, the macaron buzz then made its way into commercial marketing and food media. And the coup de grace was an appearance on Australian Masterchef, which in turn exploded its popularity into popular mainstream appeal.

The concept has rippled back from the mainstream into blogging communities beyond food and across Twitter, Facebook and other popular communities. There have been a flurry of macaron shops, books, recipes and classes by those jumping on the bandwagon and finally, it has resulted in a demand for $400 macaron towers. That’s a purchase that three years ago would have sounded totally absurd and not at all enticing to the general public. And it was all in the Spin.

Nailing your colours

In my last post I stated that I feel it is time for food bloggers to nail their colours to the mast. I have witnessed the original integrity of blogging as being diluted by advertorials and product placement.

While I have my doubts about the value and quality of Blogger Outreach in Australia, it is not something that is going away. My stance with clients is that online influence and viral marketing reach in Australia comes voluntarily from bloggers perceived as having high integrity, not just whoever responds to a PR call.

Those who write commercially sponsored posts, have a duty to inform readers or subscribers that a post is an advertorial, which will allow them to determine bias.

Unless presented with a contract or express a commitment to do a piece, a blogger is not obliged to write about a Blogger Bribe they have received. And should a blogger consider publishing a sponsored post based on a product, event or reader giveaway, I feel that they ought to be entitled to ask for payment ahead of posting it. It is to all intents an advertisement for which the blogger provides the media and the content.

If you have no desire to engage with brands and no wish for your blog to be a vehicle for their sales pitch, you may already be annoyed by spam press release emails.

Because there are some grey areas regarding permissions, the ACMA recommends those who do not wish to receive commercial offers, put a non-solicitation disclaimer on your blog. Just as I have in my sidebar, under the subhead ‘email’. I placed it there because typically email is the key word a commercial email harvester is looking for.

When I receive PR spam in spite of this, typically I respond by drawing attention to the statement. In Australia, by law there should also be an unsubscribe link on the email, which I will use if I trust that it is a verified Australian PR agency. And if the spam persists, I am not above reporting the email as contravening the Spam Act 2003.

In deciding whether to participate in promoting commercial messages on your blog, consider the theory of the Hedonic Treadmill. “According to this theory, as a person makes more money, their expectations and desires rise in tandem, which results in no permanent gain in happiness”.

After years of working with brands, I find I don’t need much in the way of consumer durables and hedonistic activities to be happy. Close ties to friends and family, plus good health are the things that count most to me.

I don't merit grinding away on the treadmill to generate money for brands without being paid for it. When I come across something I like, I will tell you about it and you can trust that it was not skewed or initiated by a third party.

Most crucially, I’ve learnt that keeping things simple ultimately makes you happier and better respected. With this integrity your opinion is trusted and well regarded. And unlike free gifts it brings lasting happiness.


"Joe" who is constantly craving said...

so very true, a very interesting read!

Simon Leong said...

A long read but a great read. So if traditional media criticise Food Bloggers then does that just mean that they are actually validating that they exist in the first place. Interesting about the linkbaiting. Haven't heard of that before but makes sense. It does mention about fallout though — so maybe this means traditional media being discredited? Love the terms 'Blogger Outreach Programs' and 'Blogger Bribes'. I'm learning a lot of jargon in this post. I'm wondering how many bloggers (food in particular) ask and get paid a fee to post something for a PR company? I think the blogging community is mostly unaware that some blogs out there are getting paid to post — so I've heard anyway. Not sure about the ACCC Advertising and Selling standards. Clearly 'Honest' and 'Advertising' should not be used in the same sentence — refer back to your previous point 'manipulative psychology'. Hence why I don't watch the news, read the papers or take notice of advertising promises. I was wondering if there's any way to stop spam comments. There seems to be deal websites that add comments just to advertise their sites but don't relate to the actual post. I wonder if I added the 'Australian Spam Act 2003' would that stop them doing it? I fully support your three last paragraphs :-)

Ben said...

Top post! Bloggers definitely need to be more aware of how and why they're being used (and why they let themselves be used sometimes).

Anonymous said...

Great article Sticky. Now I'm convinced more than ever that I am apparently missing out on the huge blizzard of PR freebies being lavished on bloggers but not me! I even taken to getting a sandwich board and a ships bell and treading the footpaths of Hobart with my sign reading: 'Will spruik for Cred' so far I've just had some yobbos throw stubbies at me from their WRX's.
Oh well...

Barbara said...

Excellent follow up to part 1.

Ed Charles said...

I've fresh from two great freebies where I've been sucked in to praise Sydney's food and food festival and last weekend to Wellington in NZ. I saw them as nice weekends away and an opportunity to eat at some places that otherwise I wouldn't get to visit as part of my budgetary constraints.

Otherwise I'm turning most down nowadays.

I'm not sure the link between anti food blog articles in papers is about building links as the journalists don't understand that stuff and in the quality papers there is no commercial link (in theory).

Simon, the way to stop spam comments is to enable the "no follow" in comments so even if people do follow the link Google won't. I usually just delete or spam them though.

Nice link baiting Sticki btw ;-)

Anonymous said...

Thanks for all the good info. We are so blasted with advertising in one way or the other everyday.
It would be good to have just plain old truthful recommendations or ideas or whatever you are offering on the blog. Hopefully more bloggers will take note, my filtering system is already overworked!

stickyfingers said...

Thank you everyone for taking the time to comment and for those who've also shared their thoughts and RTs on Twitter.

Simon, the ACCC and ACMA promote self-regulation. My understanding of the guidelines is that it does not prohibit non-disclosure of negative aspects of products, allowing ads to focus clearly on the positives.

Ed, I have no issue with people accepting freebies, however I reiterate that if they are posted then the blogger needs to be transparent, declaring that they are promoting the brand as a blog advertorial.

In terms of Link bait, while journalists may not be aware of these techniques I have it from former marketing directors of major AU dailies that it is employed. Take the current Carolyn Webb story on Bali for example.

I have had a criticism from a reader on Twitter that this piece was too subtle and could have gone further. To clarify, it is not my intention to vilify and it would be impossible to reveal all I know on the subject, short of writing a book. My aim here is to help others be better informed when making choices.

Lau@corridorkitchen said...

My blog is only just now of an age (it's one year old) where legitimate PR companies have started to contact me to place text based ads or become a 'brand influencer'.

I nearly signed up as an influencer with one company as they seemed to be very transparent and also were selling goods and services that fit with the ethos of my blog. They were happy for bloggers to make it clear that they were 'influencers'. You were able to opt out of any or all promotions they ran.

In the end I decided against it. even though they seemed legit, the rates were ok and their products were a good fit, in the fine print they stated that although they don't seek and exclusive relationship, any company that contacted me to place a link in my twitter feed or on facebook would have to first contact them. To me, that sounds quite exclusive.

But what gets me about these companies is they email you asking you if you'd be interested in something and give no indication of how much they pay or how it all works. I've had to ask a lot of questions of these companies and in most cases, it's not worth the effort of 'applying' (even though they contacted me!).

And now I'm asking myself if I even want any kind of ads on my blog at all...

Thank you for this post, it has shed a lot of light

Meow said...

J, I am proud of you that you could utilise such beautiful wordings to present this nasty reality. For me, I could have been #!$* a few times (in Cantonese so Simon, Ed and Steve don't understand ^_^)

I agree that some active Australian food bloggers are lacking maturity on a certain thing. Perhaps because of their age vs experience in this field, plus the PR companies are enhancing it. On the other hand, PR companies didn't do anything wrong, it is only the individual whom need to understand what they are blogging on, and who actually they are blogging for. Temptation over ruling.

Either way, this issue will get worst, and I hope new generation bloggers could stick with their principal (similar to how lots of genY did to charity and volunteering work). Great example would be ThankYouWater, STREAT Melbourne, Scarf Community to name a few.

I have no issue with bloggers accepting freebies, however fact still need to be told. Bloggers can't take freebies, and converted their believe of a overcooked steak to a beautiful juicy medium steak. This is not an acceptable behavior. This is luring audiences into a dream world. It will ruin the reputation of the blogger + creating a bad scene within the Food & Beverages industry, which is suffering from honestly fact. (this is how the real estate industry is with a few bad sales persons)

Views are my own.


Simon @ the heart of food said...

Thanks for taking the time to write this rather comprehensive post. It's interesting to see how things are viewed from the other side. There's certainly some things to ponder over and think about.

Have written what you have, how deeply do you feel Australian bloggers are unknowingly sucked into the various marketing tactics or worse still, not being clear with their disclosure of the nature of their involvement, acknowledge payment for services etc.? Do you feel its a wide-spread issue or a niche problem?

Jackie B said...

Good read Sticky, as a newbie blogger, I would say, wow, I didn't know the tricks ..thx for info. I have only done one ad blog so far and must admit I did not know about disclaimer but on my post, it was transparent that I was road testing a product from so and so. Thx for your info. I think too, at the end of the day, I call a spade a spade and I stay true to myself. For me this is a hobby, not a business.

Richard Elliot said...

Really interesting read. It's an issue I've been thinking about quite a lot recently.

Many bloggers seem to love the 'special' feeling of being invited to an event by a PR person. I've stopped reading several blogs because they are full of non-credible gushing praise following freebies. I want honest reviews.

I'm no pro-blogger and don't get contacted by PR agencies, but have been lucky to get a few crumbs from the kings table (or invites to group events). I go because I'm still relatively new in the Sydney food blogging scene and I want to meet like minded people. However, it does concern me that I'll be selling out and turning (the few) readers I have off.

Speaking to some fellow bloggers I've noticed 'PR' fatigue setting in and them beginning to turn down certain events. However, because the events are so cheap compared to traditional advertising and the number of bloggers so high, the ad agencies can just move down the value chain. I'm not expert, but I suspect from the ad agencies perspective we are nowhere near the tipping point of where they'll say are these second or third rate bloggers worth it?

It will be interesting to see where the balance of power between bloggers and traditional media lies in one or two years time. Will it be much different from today?

leaf (the indolent cook) said...

I don't know if we're reading the same blogs... but the ones I read have always been great at disclosing conflicts of interest.

I've started to attract interest from PR & marketing companies and so far I've not accepted any offers. I'll be honest, I do kind of feel wistful rejecting the monetary rewards but if it doesn't fit in my blog, it doesn't go into my blog.

I don't necessarily have an issue with talking about specific businesses and products, but so far it's always happened naturally - I write about them if I feel like it, simple as that. Perhaps one day I'll get an offer that aligns with my interests. I think I'd still feel a little weird because I didn't stumble upon it myself and write about it purely through my own initiative... so who knows. But I'll cross that bridge when I come to it!

e_ting said...

On the issue of reciprocity - I'm not sure about Australia, but in Hong Kong (and I dare say much of Asia), it's not only bloggers who feel obliged, but writers and journalists in traditional media too. They might try to mention brands in an article without disclosing a prior relationship to the editor. And some editors don't really care or mind, as they're so hungry for content.

That said, I think it's totally ok for PR to invite bloggers and writers to certain events or try out certain things, but they should never expect or demand something immediately in return (e.g. "you must write about this particular event"). It is a PR's job to infiltrate minds (or, well, to be more neutral (?), promote) their clients' brands and this can be done by just keeping their clients top of mind for content producers. So that, for example, when someone mentions a category of product, their clients' brand immediately comes to mind. (Soft drink -> Coke!)

I totally agree that what essentially are advertorials on blogs should be paid for, and it's also the blogger's choice whether to accept such offers. I just hope that there's a more holistic approach than just listing a set of demands and having nothing to fall back on but Acts and legal contracts. After all, a lot of people want to read about cool brands, and a lot of people like to report them - there must be a way of having the two sides meet harmoniously.

(Obviously you're going to have crappy products/brands and crappy people/publications rah-rahing on about them too, but that's been around since the existence of mass media.)

This was a very insightful read, thank you for taking the time to write it up. It's always interesting to hear from an insider.

Kenny said...

Thanks for that - much food for thought, so to speak. As far as link bait goes, as well as the Carolyn Webb story on Bali check out the Paul Sheehan haka yarn as discussed here: http://thefailedestate.blogspot.com/2011/10/turning-off-noise.html

Unknown said...

Interesting read and enjoyed getting your marketing take on it. Your claim that traditional media criticises blogging to get a spike reminds me of how TV programs used to run programs about the people with the TV ratings boxes in their houses - guaranteed ratings through the roof!

Banglarecipes said...

long article but very helpful and well written .Thanks.

ChiTree said...

Very interesting insights and observations, thanks.

Towz said...

All nails in the head sticky, and all reasons why I lost all taste in the foodblogasphere maybe a year and a half ago...both in reading posts after posts of sycophantic 'ads' for the latest 'it' opening in town (shit a half-boiled egg is still a half-boiled egg even if it's boiled by Andrew McConnell et al.!). It also killed my inspiration in continuing with my own considerably 'verbose' blog @Spot4Nosh. Oh and the arrival of a little angel that is my firstborn may have had something to do with it too :-)

Paul said...

So I'm quite late to this article of yours (and part 1) but I must say it's all still highly relevant. I really enjoyed reading through this article - it's rare to get this sort of insight that's so relevant to what we as bloggers do.

Personally I only write about products/events if I feel like it's a relevant fit for my blog, and something that I genuinely think my readers will be interested in.

It can be tough for many to avoid being unwittingly manipulated but it's so important to remember that PR firms are just that, PR firms. They are not your friends and they don't honestly think that you are great. Do what you feel comfortable with and don't be afraid to say no, or to write a critical piece (or decline to write a piece at all).

Ultimately, the only obligation that bloggers have is to themselves.